Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="CamrnCrz1974, post: 3031249, member: 1052"] [USER=7492]@DefenseBB[/USER] , first of all, thank you for putting this together. I do not presume to speak for the board, but in this case, I think I am safe in saying that we all appreciate your hard work. My only issue is that the statistics in your chart tell games played and averages, but it does not measure out level of competition. Using RealTimeRPI.com, here are certain RPI metrics for Notre Dame, Louisville, and UConn (with hyperlinks to each team's page on RealTimeRPI.com), as of Friday, February 8, 2019: [URL='http://www.realtimerpi.com/rpi_158_Women.html'][U]NOTRE DAME[/U][/URL] 10-3 against the RPI Top 50 5-1 against the RPI Top 20 2-1 against the RPI Top 10 [URL='http://www.realtimerpi.com/rpi_221_Women.html'][U]LOUISVILLE[/U][/URL] 12-1 against the RPI Top 50 4-1 against the RPI Top 20 2-1 against the RPI Top 10 [URL='http://www.realtimerpi.com/rpi_155_Women.html'][U]UCONN[/U][/URL] 5-2 against the RPI Top 50 2-2 against the RPI Top 20 1-2 against the RPI Top 10 The RPI ratings can be considered measures of the quality of the opposition, whereas using the total number of games in a season includes all teams (including any non-conference cupcakes and conference teams with lowly RPI rankings). UConn is 13-0 against teams in the triple digits (ranked 100 or worse) in RPI, whereas Notre Dame is 6-0 and Louisville is 9-0 in such games. It would be interesting to see the individual player statistics for Ogunbowale, Durr, and Samuelson for games against RPI Top 50, RPI Top 20, and RPI Top 10. Of course, I am going to be the Boneyard visitor who mentions that this "would be interesting" while putting it out there for someone else to do the work. Is it any wonder why some on this board hate Duke? LOL!!! [USER=26]@EricLA[/USER] [USER=1511]@ucbart[/USER] [/QUOTE]

Verification: First name of men's bb coach

Forum statistics

Threads: 164,406

Messages: 4,394,797

Members: 10,207

Latest member: jskwrite