Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="hoophuskee, post: 4140073, member: 3535"] I'm sorry I missed this before. [B]Adding -[/B] however I expect we're going to be up and down (still a pretty good team. Win some ugly etc). I was listening to some guy on youtube speak of how UCONN wasn't impressive vs UCLA. Among nearly everything else he said which I felt was wrong - this too - in terms of he was evaluating UCONN by measuring "how impressive" they were. Needless to say I feel he and whoever is part of their site have a bigtime bias against UCONN even though the guy suggested he was a UCONN fan. You were suggesting that this injury was a major blow as was Geno, right? I agree. They aren't trying to be "impressive" and they will have some continued "funks" along the way. I think these injuries at once are near-term catastrophic. However through catastrophe you survive. Right now UCONN just needs to survive and slowly get others back (but expect soem "funks.".). Some think a few days or week etc and you should be fine. I think no way. There is less margin for error. The UCONN players are not pros and none of the active are superstars (at the moment). Just as we hear throughout our lives that all-star teams are flawed; this team in a lower-level way is an all-star team. For consistency purposes, a few weeks together playing a new way than before with such drastic change won't be so easy to adjust for non-pros with limited margin of error. You agree? :) [/QUOTE]