Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="KnightBridgeAZ, post: 4494014, member: 591"] I didn't remember it was Wiggins and I'm not sure there were 4 seconds left, but that was the incident. Less than a second I thought. In any case, yes, it was a foul. A totally unnecessary foul since there was no way Stanford could have scored. That's why I think less than 4 seconds - because I am 100% certain that the situation was such that Stanford could not score except by a foul. Because of the circumstances, I think Barlow should have swallowed her whistle. Not because I think fouls should not be called, but a meaningless foul except for the fact it lead to winning free-throws? I have read several refs over the years say they try not to "decide" games in that way. Prince unfortunately made some dumb plays among the many good ones. Not the only player to do so, of course, but . . . [/QUOTE]