Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Football Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Men's Basketball Forum
Our Resume Is Set, What's Our Seed?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="auror, post: 3893009, member: 1329"] I created a table comparison of these teams. I distilled down the key metrics and added a few that I and others mentally create. Then I compared all the teams to UConn in each category, then checked who had the most edges over UConn out of 7. Net good W is Q1 wins minus Q3+Q4 losses. R/N is road/neutral. SOR includes BPI SOR, KPI, and WAB. Pred is BPI, KenPom, Sagarin, and Torvik. BM is the current bracket matrix seed (did not use those for comparison).. [TABLE] [TR] [TD]TEAM[/TD] [TD]BM[/TD] [TD][URL='https://barttorvik.com/teamsheets.php?sort=1&conlimit=All']NET[/URL][/TD] [TD][URL='https://barttorvik.com/teamsheets.php?sort=4&conlimit=All']SOR AVG[/URL][/TD] [TD][URL='https://barttorvik.com/teamsheets.php?sort=8&conlimit=All']PRED AVG[/URL][/TD] [TD]Q1+2 WIN%[/TD] [TD]NET GOOD W[/TD] [TD]R/N WIN%[/TD] [TD]SOS[/TD] [TD]Edges[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Missouri[/TD] [TD]6[/TD] [TD]47[/TD] [TD]23[/TD] [TD]48[/TD] [TD]0.500[/TD] [TD]7[/TD] [TD]0.615[/TD] [TD]20[/TD] [TD]3[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Oklahoma[/TD] [TD]7[/TD] [TD]37[/TD] [TD]44[/TD] [TD]36[/TD] [TD]0.357[/TD] [TD]4[/TD] [TD]0.417[/TD] [TD]25[/TD] [TD]1[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Oregon[/TD] [TD]7[/TD] [TD]34[/TD] [TD]24[/TD] [TD]39[/TD] [TD]0.692[/TD] [TD]0[/TD] [TD]0.692[/TD] [TD]80[/TD] [TD]3[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Clemson[/TD] [TD]7[/TD] [TD]41[/TD] [TD]17[/TD] [TD]41[/TD] [TD]0.625[/TD] [TD]2[/TD] [TD]0.455[/TD] [TD]30[/TD] [TD]3[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Wisconsin[/TD] [TD]7[/TD] [TD]26[/TD] [TD]36[/TD] [TD]14[/TD] [TD]0.478[/TD] [TD]5[/TD] [TD]0.462[/TD] [TD]6[/TD] [TD]4[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Florida[/TD] [TD]8[/TD] [TD]31[/TD] [TD]41[/TD] [TD]34[/TD] [TD]0.500[/TD] [TD]4[/TD] [TD]0.571[/TD] [TD]23[/TD] [TD]1[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]LSU[/TD] [TD]8[/TD] [TD]28[/TD] [TD]25[/TD] [TD]28[/TD] [TD]0.500[/TD] [TD]5[/TD] [TD]0.538[/TD] [TD]35[/TD] [TD]4[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Loyola Chicago[/TD] [TD]8[/TD] [TD]10[/TD] [TD]34[/TD] [TD]20[/TD] [TD]0.600[/TD] [TD]2[/TD] [TD]0.733[/TD] [TD]143[/TD] [TD]4[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]San Diego St.[/TD] [TD]8[/TD] [TD]18[/TD] [TD]21[/TD] [TD]20[/TD] [TD]0.667[/TD] [TD]1[/TD] [TD]0.833[/TD] [TD]120[/TD] [TD]4[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]UConn[/TD] [TD]9[/TD] [TD]30[/TD] [TD]35[/TD] [TD]16[/TD] [TD]0.500[/TD] [TD]4[/TD] [TD]0.667[/TD] [TD]55[/TD] [TD]--[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] By this model, SDSU, Loyola, LSU, and Wisconsin would be all slightly above UConn. Missouri, Oregon, and Clemson right on par with UConn, and Florida and Oklahoma clearly behind. The committee has shown a tendency to value the SOR and Net Good W quite substantially, so that probably puts Missouri ahead of UConn as well. So I think we end up as the best 8 seed. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Men's Basketball Forum
Our Resume Is Set, What's Our Seed?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom