Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Draman, post: 3032054, member: 7389"] The best part of the whole UNC thing is they gave separate, completely contradictory responses to the 2 bodies that investigated them. They told the NCAA that the classes were fraudulent, but also available to non student athletes, and thus not an added benefit. At the exact same time, they were being investigated by the Southern Accrediting Board. Losing accreditation would have been a much bigger deal than NCAA sanctions, so their response to the board was the the classes were legitimate but that they had reprimanded the teachers for being too easy. Literally the responses to these 2 groups went out like 6 days apart and are 100% contradictory, and yet both sides just took UNC on their word [/QUOTE]