Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Football Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
OT: The game is Just too Rough
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="YKCornelius, post: 5312113, member: 9864"] Well, I do not share the opinion that all of the refs in the WNBA are incompetent. Take Maj Forsberg for instance, who not only has refereed numerous WNBA Finals and NCAA Final Fours, she also has worked bunches of FIBA tournaments - including several World Cups - and even the Olympics. IMO, Maj is the best woman referee in the US basketball environment, and one of the best in the world. That said, if she is paired up with two weak officials, it might be hard for some to differentiate amongst the crew as a whole. IMO, the issue is lack of consistency - as many coaches and fans continue to rail about. Not only how games are officiated from one game to the next, but also inside the three man crews that are often a mixture of experienced and less-experienced refs. The WNBA can't just fire all of the refs midway through the season, so I am curious to understand what folks think should be done for the way forward. IMO, a two pronged approach from the Commissioner's office is needed - one for the short-term and another for the long-term. The short-term involves, as mentioned previously, a communique to the cadre of head referees, spelling out expectations for the rest of the season. The easiest expectation to convey is to start calling freedom of movement violations - these are obvious and have been called at every level of WBB, from grade school to the pros. Also, immediately add a rule change that allows an additional 2-3 challenges per game (or two per half). It won't lengthen the game noticeably, and will give the appearance that the league office is committed to getting the calls right. At the same time, the extra challenges will act as teaching moments in the game amongst the three-person crew, thereby shaping better officiating. The long-term approach requires better planning, better pay (to include incentives for better performance - however measured), and training events for crews to work on working together consistently. I haven't done a deep dive into the WNBA referees this year, but I can attest that LAST season there were at least a dozen refs who worked the NCAA D-I tournament as well as WNBA postseason. I would contend that professional referees need transition time to adapt from from one construct (NCAA or FIBA) to the next (WNBA). Just like the players need pre-season practices to get in sync with their new teammates, the refs would/should benefit from the same. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
OT: The game is Just too Rough
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom