Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
UConn Football
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Men's Basketball Forum
OT: TECH...Getting Fired Up
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="HuskyHawk, post: 2482840, member: 1414"] Oh, I'm an idiot now. Fortunately your opinion on that is meaningless since you are obviously an idiot and a lemming incapable of independent thought. The talking points about Net Neutrality being thrown around aren't even based on a realistic view of how the internet works. [URL='https://www.wired.com/2014/06/net_neutrality_missing/']Wired did a nice write up on this[/URL]. [INDENT]"The net neutrality debate is based on a mental model of the internet that hasn’t been accurate for more than a decade. We tend to think of the internet as a massive public network that everyone connects to in exactly the same way. We envision data traveling from Google and Yahoo and Uber and every other online company into a massive internet backbone, before moving to a vast array of ISPs that then shuttle it into our homes. That could be a neutral network, but it’s not today’s internet. It couldn’t be. Too much of the traffic is now coming from just a handful of companies." [/INDENT] It is imperative that we increase competition among ISPs. I absolutely agree with that. Competition will drive innovation, decrease prices and ensure that the type of inappropriate throttling people worry about doesn't occur. Much of the problem on the competition side is because local cities and towns negotiated exclusive deals. That needs to end, and the feds should bar that practice. Very fast wireless is coming as well, and that will change the model for ISPs. The problem with Net Neutrality, and treating ISPs as a utility, is that the cost of being a highly regulated utility is the end of competition, and usually the end of innovation. I pay over $200, including land line. But three HD boxes don't help. Yet I recall in the 1980's it was easy to have just a phone bill be over $200, because we all paid for long distance. So what I now get for that $200 is a lot more than it was then. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forum statistics
Threads
164,511
Messages
4,399,489
Members
10,212
Latest member
MurrDog
.
..
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Men's Basketball Forum
OT: TECH...Getting Fired Up
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom