Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
UConn Football
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Off Topic Boards
Food and Travel
OT: Scotch thread
.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="storrsroars, post: 3998414, member: 2500"] While I'm flattered [USER=93]@8893[/USER] would think I know the answer, I haven't really got a clue. "Smooth is just the absence of bold"... I wouldn't go there, but that's my coffee experience talking. In coffee, "bold" typically means "overroasted", and while that's a profile sought by many, it's not seen as a positive by those within the industry, or serious coffee consumers. In coffee, "smooth" is usually a function of expert blending in addition to expert roasting, although there are certain beans (Jamaica Blue Mountain, Kona, Bali Blue Moon) that offer a much "smoother" profile than most other single origins. But there, the lack of acidity in those beans is often viewed by connoisseurs as a negative. I'd add that phenols are always present in coffee, but need to be modulated, as phenolic flavors are very undesirable, which obviously isn't the same in scotch (see Laphroaig). So whenever I try to understand scotch using what I know about chemistry and physics in coffee, I simply get more confused. Age certainly plays a role, but I'm hesitant to suggest how much as that's an area I truly don't understand as [URL='https://www.thewhiskyexchange.com/whisky/age/16-year-old-whisky']prices also indicate that aging after bottling plays a role in flavor development.[/URL] Anyway, I dislike any suggestion that "bold" is necessarily a good thing, while "smooth" seems to be leaving something on the table because "smooth" is in the eye of the beholder - tons of scotch drinkers wouldn't consider Laga 16 as "smooth". But fans of peat might. I think the answer is as simple as "distilling is an art as much as a science". More than any other booze category, it's a rabbit hole that's too deep for me to deal with beyond, "I like this and I don't like that as much". That seemingly every distiller has numerous expressions of its whisky would indicate distillers can obviously control pretty much everything in the process to create whatever they want. So if there's a market for the various expressions, why not? Best I can tell, it all gets sold eventually. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forum statistics
Threads
164,477
Messages
4,397,739
Members
10,211
Latest member
MurrDog
.
..
Forums
Off Topic Boards
Food and Travel
OT: Scotch thread
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom