Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="HuskyHawk, post: 3783275, member: 1414"] Good feedback. I’ll let him know. The site will eventually aggregate reviews from multiple review sites in one place, so will have different perspectives. Whisky Advocate among others. I find that most of the “aficionado” reviewers, like Jay, tend to find lower proof whisky like Lagavulin 16 to be underwhelming. For example, I agree the Lagavulin 12 is certainly better (to me) than the 16 (and they do charge more). But if you’re someone who adds water, then no, it wouldn’t be. That’s probably an older review as well, he will probably revisit it. Still, fair points. With a broader audience he should adjust his approach a bit to avoid that “casual fan” tone. I do get what you mean by that. [/QUOTE]