OT - Officials Consider Airport Of The Future At Bradley | The Boneyard

OT - Officials Consider Airport Of The Future At Bradley

Drew

Its a post, about nothing!
Joined
Jun 19, 2013
Messages
7,881
Reaction Score
28,013
Officials Consider Airport Of The Future At Bradley

The Bradley International Airport of the not-so-distant future will feature nonstop service to international hubs like Frankfurt and London, and fly passengers to new domestic destinations from Seattle to New Orleans.

That's the goal, at least, as Bradley aims to shore up its core market, which includes Connecticut, Western Massachusetts, and southern portions of New Hampshire and Vermont.

"That's a very, very healthy market when you're talking about international travel," said Kevin Dillon, the executive director for the Connecticut Airport Authority. "The goal is to convince airlines to put flights in to serve that market that we know is flying every year, and lives closer to Hartford than they do to New York or Boston."

The potential service additions are outlined in a working paper for the airport's new master plan, which is expected to be completed later this year. The Federal Aviation Administration requires the plans, subject to the agency's approval, from airports that wish to receive federal assistance.

Dillon said the report serves more as a set of realistic objectives than a collection of actual expectations. The authority is trying to capture customers from Bradley's core area who are "leaking" to other airports in the region, according to the working paper.

"These are areas where we think the level of activity out of this region could justify service to these different locations," said Dillon.

Service to Frankfurt, for instance, was included because 250 passengers per day in Bradley's core area flew to and from Germany, Austria and Switzerland between April 2015 and March 2016.

If Bradley were to add trips to Frankfurt, therefore, it could regain the customers who are choosing other airports in the region, like Logan in Boston and JFK in New York, according to the paper's authors.

Over 1 million people in the core area take transatlantic flights every year.

Also included in the forecast are domestic additions like Seattle, which Dillon called a "primary goal," as well as Phoenix, Austin and New Orleans, among others.
 

Chin Diesel

Power of Love
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
32,852
Reaction Score
100,779
I read this yesterday and contemplated putting in the realignment board- right after I read about wanting additional flights to N'awlins.
 

Exit 4

This space for rent
Joined
Feb 3, 2012
Messages
10,497
Reaction Score
38,801
Not huge if the have to subsidize it like the subsidize those direct flights to Ireland.
 

hardcorehusky

Lost patience with the garden variety UConn fan
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
2,739
Reaction Score
13,509
It would increase the value of the airport so the state can sell it to fund the deficiency in the pension plans!!
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
19,227
Reaction Score
14,041
Not huge if the have to subsidize it like the subsidize those direct flights to Ireland.
We do have the same amount of Fortune 500 companies as the state of Massachusetts. Gotta keep developing accordingly.
 
Joined
Mar 20, 2015
Messages
4,381
Reaction Score
1,362
Yes, but people from Europe actually want to visit Boston and NYC. Not CT or Hartford. So hard to have limited tourist volumes. But these smaller and longer range jets like 737-MAX and A320 NEO probably make it more economical.


We do have the same amount of Fortune 500 companies as the state of Massachusetts. Gotta keep developing accordingly.
 

Exit 4

This space for rent
Joined
Feb 3, 2012
Messages
10,497
Reaction Score
38,801
We do have the same amount of Fortune 500 companies as the state of Massachusetts. Gotta keep developing accordingly.

Its about picking priorities and it seems to me that a state as densely populated as CT, albeit a small state, shouldn't prioritize subsidizing air travel as a means of economic development. I understand (but might not agree) about rural states doing it, but we really shouldn't need or bother to cut deals like we did with Air Lingus. My concern is that when the subsidy ends, the airline will pull out and whatever mojo the route had developed from a business stand point will evaporate. Anyways... its about priorities and I would guess that there are better things to do then to plug the operating costs of airlines. The state should do capital projects, not operating deficits.
 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
58,050
Reaction Score
214,581
The concept drawings look like it will be pretty busy.

jetsons-flying-cars.gif
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
6,578
Reaction Score
16,671
BDL is a great airport. Simple. Easy in and out. If you have been to others, you know what I mean. Try getting in and out of SFO, BWI, Philly, OHare, without walking forever, taking trams, and driving 15 mins to get to a rental car facility. If they could expand direct routes, it would be ideal. It really is well positioned for International Travel when the choices are JFK, Newark or Boston. It just needs to get critical mass. One route to a hub in Ireland doesn't cut it. If they could get direct to London, Paris, and Rome they would start picking up both business and vacation travelers from Mass, NY, CT, and RI.
 

Online statistics

Members online
299
Guests online
1,817
Total visitors
2,116

Forum statistics

Threads
158,017
Messages
4,131,123
Members
10,016
Latest member
RipBenEmek


Top Bottom