"Please take the time to read something[I do wish that you would have been a bit more specific about you meant by "something"] fully if your
Hmmm... Writing comprehension aside, I'll take my best stab at understanding what you meant to post....
My best decipher chokes on the grammar and ambiguity issues, but it still gives us two possible deconstructions....
A) Either posts must be responded to in the positive -OR- one must "read something fully" prior to openly "declaring another's post to be wrong".
B) Either posts must be factually correct -OR- one must "read something fully" prior to posting a "factually incorrect post."
I'm not familiar with either of these new standards for posting a message, but then I'm not familiar with a lot of the current pop scene either... who the heck is "Chiddy Bang?"
Wow, a reading assignment prior to posting messages that fall into either of your two cases.... Geez, I don't know... I think most posters are too lazy to do reading assignments before posting.... I know I am....
And then when one considers the paltry number of "factually Correct" or "positive response" posts that pass through here these days, I would expect this board to rack up somewhere in the neighborhood of 3 to 5 posts a year.... I'm not sure they would keep this joint open under those conditions....
I like the old rules better... you know ones... the ones where posters post whatever they like as long as they don't hurt, harass, or demean another poster.
So, if you don't mind, I'll stick with the old rules.... I am pretty sure DC will do the same....
Your Ol' Pal Boo
