I hadn't been following this story, but after reading the article it seems to me that there are two conflicting issues at play: The fired coach, in order to have a successful team, was trying to instill discipline and personal responsibilty in her players. The school administrators clearly have a different objective. With an inner-city school, it's possible they are concerned that if the player is not reinstated (and has an additional reason to come to school), the kid could drop out of the system entirely. I know I am just speculating (although the article does mention the kid had academic issues), but without more info it is hard to understand why the administration wouldn't back the coach.