Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="MexicoHusky, post: 3788271, member: 6438"] After thinking about it, ill elaborate my position. I agree with much of what you say. Pre-Durant, no doubt Curry was better than Klay. Curry deservedly won mvp. But something happened as the team evolved with Durant. Much of the time, Durant was clearly the best of the three. But there were times Klay rivaled Durant in that category. Sorta like a 70/30 thing. Durant was the best player on the floor 70% of the time and Klay was the best player on the floor 30% of the time. During this time Curry kinda became a bit of a sideshow. It was like the regular offense consisted of Durant and Klay making shots that were impossible to guard. They would beat every team in the league with those 2 making the types of shots they could make. But every other game or so Curry would start making crazy 30 ft three point shots. Curry's shots seemed a bit outside the regular flow of offense. Curry's shots took nothing away from the regular offense. If Curry didn't make those shots, the Warriors would win by 10ish. If Curry made those shots the game was over at half. So it was late in the Warrior dynasty that Klay seemed to surpass Curry and at times rivaled Durant. [/QUOTE]