- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 1,518
- Reaction Score
- 3,737
Cincinnati employed a shotgun silent count that utilized the left guard as a trigger. The left guard turned and looked back, after being set, to view the QB motion for the snap. Then he tapped the center to let him know when to snap the ball.
Getting set in your stance, then looking back at the QB right before the ball is snapped, isn't considered a false start? What would happen if Wirth or Stephen launched across the line and pummelled the left guard as soon as he moved his head?
#1 - UCONN clearly knows when the ball will be snapped because the left guard is tipping this off. Obviously this helps the defense time their blitzes. I didn't witness any random snap counts.
#2 - If Wirth or Stephen reacts and hammers the left guard in an effort to induce a false start, it's possible they deter Cincy from using this system and disrupt their silent count plan.
Either way ... UCONN has got to find a way to turn this into an advantage.
Anybody else witness this? Thoughts?
Getting set in your stance, then looking back at the QB right before the ball is snapped, isn't considered a false start? What would happen if Wirth or Stephen launched across the line and pummelled the left guard as soon as he moved his head?
#1 - UCONN clearly knows when the ball will be snapped because the left guard is tipping this off. Obviously this helps the defense time their blitzes. I didn't witness any random snap counts.
#2 - If Wirth or Stephen reacts and hammers the left guard in an effort to induce a false start, it's possible they deter Cincy from using this system and disrupt their silent count plan.
Either way ... UCONN has got to find a way to turn this into an advantage.
Anybody else witness this? Thoughts?