Kibitzer
Sky Soldier
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 5,674
- Reaction Score
- 24,704
Which is preferable when describing the assertive or even hostile behavior of a (usually UConn) player?
Take your pick. Either noun is OK and the adjective "aggressive" is a useful modifier.
What's the difference? A very slight and subtle variation in nuance. Both words share many of the same synonyms that pertain to some act(s) of hostile behavior. Those associated with aggression tend to convey a deliberately mean or malicious intent (e.g., "bellicosity" or "truculence"). OTOH, the ones that relate to aggressiveness come up a tad short in severity (e.g., "feisty" or "pugnacious").
My little research suggests that the choice between aggression and aggressiveness is a pick 'em exercise. I personally prefer the "aggressive/aggressiveness" combo but an "ahem" is not warranted for those who admire acts of aggression.
Take your pick. Either noun is OK and the adjective "aggressive" is a useful modifier.
What's the difference? A very slight and subtle variation in nuance. Both words share many of the same synonyms that pertain to some act(s) of hostile behavior. Those associated with aggression tend to convey a deliberately mean or malicious intent (e.g., "bellicosity" or "truculence"). OTOH, the ones that relate to aggressiveness come up a tad short in severity (e.g., "feisty" or "pugnacious").
My little research suggests that the choice between aggression and aggressiveness is a pick 'em exercise. I personally prefer the "aggressive/aggressiveness" combo but an "ahem" is not warranted for those who admire acts of aggression.