JoePgh
Cranky pants and wise acre
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2011
- Messages
- 3,756
- Reaction Score
- 22,102
... that apart from the issue of missed shots (which is basically uncontrollable), the main problem was defense, not offense. I agree with those who say that with a normal shooting percentage, UConn would have scored in the mid-80’s, close to its season average. There were some noticeable and correctable offensive problems such as inaccurate passes and missed layups, but basically the offense was fine (apart from shooting accuracy).
I think it is quite plausible that the offensive problems were attributable to the long break, Megan’s recent illness, and perhaps the long travel. If that is true, then we should not see similar problems against Cal on 12/22. If those symptoms are still observed against Cal, then it’s time to be more concerned.
BUT ... defense is another matter. The game exposed the fact that neither of the “young” starters (Megan and Christyn) have really mastered defense at the elite college level. It was Christyn’s problems with OU screens that allowed Robertson to get open for most of her 3-point shots. On several plays where there was a need to switch, Megan was clearly confused and hesitated, allowing an open shot or an open path to the basket. It’s a little surprising that this was not particularly in evidence against Notre Dame, but maybe Sherri Coale studied the ND tape and saw something she could exploit.
The defensive problems extended to the bench, in what little time Geno allowed to his bench. I didn’t notice any defensive lapses by Kyla, but ONO and especially Mikayla showed confusion on their defensive assignments, similar to Megan and Christyn.
I’m guessing that UConn probably gave up 10-15 points unnecessarily due to defensive confusion by its less experienced players. That WILL probably continue against Cal, since something like that can’t be corrected in a single practice session. But it should be correctable by tournament time.
Overall, I enjoyed watching the replay. It was not depressing, as I expected it to be. There were lots of good plays (unfortunately very few good shots) by UConn players, and the problems (while real) should be correctable at least in the longer term.
I think it is quite plausible that the offensive problems were attributable to the long break, Megan’s recent illness, and perhaps the long travel. If that is true, then we should not see similar problems against Cal on 12/22. If those symptoms are still observed against Cal, then it’s time to be more concerned.
BUT ... defense is another matter. The game exposed the fact that neither of the “young” starters (Megan and Christyn) have really mastered defense at the elite college level. It was Christyn’s problems with OU screens that allowed Robertson to get open for most of her 3-point shots. On several plays where there was a need to switch, Megan was clearly confused and hesitated, allowing an open shot or an open path to the basket. It’s a little surprising that this was not particularly in evidence against Notre Dame, but maybe Sherri Coale studied the ND tape and saw something she could exploit.
The defensive problems extended to the bench, in what little time Geno allowed to his bench. I didn’t notice any defensive lapses by Kyla, but ONO and especially Mikayla showed confusion on their defensive assignments, similar to Megan and Christyn.
I’m guessing that UConn probably gave up 10-15 points unnecessarily due to defensive confusion by its less experienced players. That WILL probably continue against Cal, since something like that can’t be corrected in a single practice session. But it should be correctable by tournament time.
Overall, I enjoyed watching the replay. It was not depressing, as I expected it to be. There were lots of good plays (unfortunately very few good shots) by UConn players, and the problems (while real) should be correctable at least in the longer term.