Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="gtcam, post: 2616682, member: 2844"] GREAT post - couldn't agree with you more Kathy I was/am now not caring if KO stays or KO goes but if this was done to avoid some type of payment then it is totally wrong if they cannot pin something specific on KO and make it stick without even a shred of doubt. If the AD David Benedict is gambling that by doing this early and getting the best possible person with the knowledge that they then can negotiate with KO (while the replacement knows there is little in form of damage control) - that is wrong - not saying that it is not done in business as a tactic - but to do it to a loyal colleague - is just plain wrong - IF that is the case I have no idea right now but I am close to some folks most likely to know specifics involved and it will be interesting to hear snippets as time goes on. [/QUOTE]