Oline Woes | The Boneyard

Oline Woes

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Sep 11, 2011
Messages
705
Reaction Score
2,695
No apparent improvement from last year. I would say they have even regressed. The hell with pulling guards and counters, let's just try straight ahead "hat-on-a-hat" blocking and have the backs hit the line as fast as possible. These delayed handoffs 5 yards deep are resulting in too many very ugly negative yardage plays.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
35,980
Reaction Score
33,486
In their defense, there have been 3 different guys at LG. But I very much agree with straight ahead blocking. They need to take advantage of their size.
 
Joined
Jan 3, 2014
Messages
602
Reaction Score
1,829
In their defense, there have been 3 different guys at LG. But I very much agree with straight ahead blocking. They need to take advantage of their size.

Hopkins limping on the sideline w/the crutch didn't look close to returning either :(
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2015
Messages
21,125
Reaction Score
53,299
No apparent improvement from last year. I would say they have even regressed. The hell with pulling guards and counters, let's just try straight ahead "hat-on-a-hat" blocking and have the backs hit the line as fast as possible. These delayed handoffs 5 yards deep are resulting in too many very ugly negative yardage plays.
I cannot stand how long it takes us to hand the ball off. The holes are closed before the backs can hit it.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
22,666
Reaction Score
8,712
In their defense, there have been 3 different guys at LG. But I very much agree with straight ahead blocking. They need to take advantage of their size.

We have played 4 different LGs: Hopkins, Vachery, Schafenacker and Rutherford.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
6,578
Reaction Score
16,671
Close down the gaps, hat on hat, Rbs hit the designed holes. Enough read run horse Shiite. Of course, on short yardage these guys haven't moved anybody. They are tall and lose leverage quickly. So, it's very possible even man on man blocking doesn't get it done.
 
Joined
Sep 11, 2011
Messages
705
Reaction Score
2,695
Close down the gaps, hat on hat, Rbs hit the designed holes. Enough read run horse Shiite. Of course, on short yardage these guys haven't moved anybody. They are tall and lose leverage quickly. So, it's very possible even man on man blocking doesn't get it done.

True but I still think its worth a try. Certainly better than watching Newsome get crushed for -4 just as he gets the ball.
 

ZOOCONN

the drive to win has to come from within
Joined
Jul 29, 2014
Messages
888
Reaction Score
2,357
Close down the gaps, hat on hat, Rbs hit the designed holes. Enough read run horse Shiite. Of course, on short yardage these guys haven't moved anybody. They are tall and lose leverage quickly. So, it's very possible even man on man blocking doesn't get it done.

shortening down the O-line splits will most likely exacerbate the problem, keeping the splits as they are allows a little more room for the backs even if the O-line cant manhandle their blocking assignment. Also the counter plays are good when used correctly in the fold of the offense but when they are used incorrectly such as short yardage plays where you cannot get caught in the backfield ala navy then they leave you vulnerable to backside pressure from the gap created by the pulling guard/tackle. just like everything else if this offense was utilized properly and to its full potential it could be very difficult to stop.
 
Joined
Aug 30, 2011
Messages
4,456
Reaction Score
7,879
No apparent improvement from last year. I would say they have even regressed. The hell with pulling guards and counters, let's just try straight ahead "hat-on-a-hat" blocking and have the backs hit the line as fast as possible. These delayed handoffs 5 yards deep are resulting in too many very ugly negative yardage plays.
I cannot stand how long it takes us to hand the ball off. The holes are closed before the backs can hit it.
like failed draw plays doesnt it?
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
6,578
Reaction Score
16,671
shortening down the O-line splits will most likely exacerbate the problem, keeping the splits as they are allows a little more room for the backs even if the O-line cant manhandle their blocking assignment. Also the counter plays are good when used correctly in the fold of the offense but when they are used incorrectly such as short yardage plays where you cannot get caught in the backfield ala navy then they leave you vulnerable to backside pressure from the gap created by the pulling guard/tackle. just like everything else if this offense was utilized properly and to its full potential it could be very difficult to stop.
Yes, you are right. My point was we should be able to get 4 yards a carry just moving out the LOS with the size we have at least against the majority of opponents. We obviously have tremendous size but slow feet. The counter is great against faster teams leaning on primary reads and having over pursuit tendencies but it also means lineman need to hold and seal or kick-out their opponents on the counter flow....not an evident strength from what I see. Requires good feet and body control movement.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
412
Guests online
2,620
Total visitors
3,032

Forum statistics

Threads
159,660
Messages
4,199,202
Members
10,066
Latest member
FWS85


.
Top Bottom