Oline Woes | The Boneyard

Oline Woes

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Sep 11, 2011
Messages
652
Reaction Score
2,313
No apparent improvement from last year. I would say they have even regressed. The hell with pulling guards and counters, let's just try straight ahead "hat-on-a-hat" blocking and have the backs hit the line as fast as possible. These delayed handoffs 5 yards deep are resulting in too many very ugly negative yardage plays.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
35,639
Reaction Score
32,132
In their defense, there have been 3 different guys at LG. But I very much agree with straight ahead blocking. They need to take advantage of their size.
 
Joined
Jan 3, 2014
Messages
590
Reaction Score
1,785
In their defense, there have been 3 different guys at LG. But I very much agree with straight ahead blocking. They need to take advantage of their size.

Hopkins limping on the sideline w/the crutch didn't look close to returning either :(
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2015
Messages
20,819
Reaction Score
50,591
No apparent improvement from last year. I would say they have even regressed. The hell with pulling guards and counters, let's just try straight ahead "hat-on-a-hat" blocking and have the backs hit the line as fast as possible. These delayed handoffs 5 yards deep are resulting in too many very ugly negative yardage plays.
I cannot stand how long it takes us to hand the ball off. The holes are closed before the backs can hit it.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
22,442
Reaction Score
6,194
In their defense, there have been 3 different guys at LG. But I very much agree with straight ahead blocking. They need to take advantage of their size.

We have played 4 different LGs: Hopkins, Vachery, Schafenacker and Rutherford.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
6,578
Reaction Score
16,671
Close down the gaps, hat on hat, Rbs hit the designed holes. Enough read run horse Shiite. Of course, on short yardage these guys haven't moved anybody. They are tall and lose leverage quickly. So, it's very possible even man on man blocking doesn't get it done.
 
Joined
Sep 11, 2011
Messages
652
Reaction Score
2,313
Close down the gaps, hat on hat, Rbs hit the designed holes. Enough read run horse Shiite. Of course, on short yardage these guys haven't moved anybody. They are tall and lose leverage quickly. So, it's very possible even man on man blocking doesn't get it done.

True but I still think its worth a try. Certainly better than watching Newsome get crushed for -4 just as he gets the ball.
 

ZOOCONN

the drive to win has to come from within
Joined
Jul 29, 2014
Messages
820
Reaction Score
1,932
Close down the gaps, hat on hat, Rbs hit the designed holes. Enough read run horse Shiite. Of course, on short yardage these guys haven't moved anybody. They are tall and lose leverage quickly. So, it's very possible even man on man blocking doesn't get it done.

shortening down the O-line splits will most likely exacerbate the problem, keeping the splits as they are allows a little more room for the backs even if the O-line cant manhandle their blocking assignment. Also the counter plays are good when used correctly in the fold of the offense but when they are used incorrectly such as short yardage plays where you cannot get caught in the backfield ala navy then they leave you vulnerable to backside pressure from the gap created by the pulling guard/tackle. just like everything else if this offense was utilized properly and to its full potential it could be very difficult to stop.
 
Joined
Aug 30, 2011
Messages
4,392
Reaction Score
7,663
No apparent improvement from last year. I would say they have even regressed. The hell with pulling guards and counters, let's just try straight ahead "hat-on-a-hat" blocking and have the backs hit the line as fast as possible. These delayed handoffs 5 yards deep are resulting in too many very ugly negative yardage plays.
I cannot stand how long it takes us to hand the ball off. The holes are closed before the backs can hit it.
like failed draw plays doesnt it?
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
6,578
Reaction Score
16,671
shortening down the O-line splits will most likely exacerbate the problem, keeping the splits as they are allows a little more room for the backs even if the O-line cant manhandle their blocking assignment. Also the counter plays are good when used correctly in the fold of the offense but when they are used incorrectly such as short yardage plays where you cannot get caught in the backfield ala navy then they leave you vulnerable to backside pressure from the gap created by the pulling guard/tackle. just like everything else if this offense was utilized properly and to its full potential it could be very difficult to stop.
Yes, you are right. My point was we should be able to get 4 yards a carry just moving out the LOS with the size we have at least against the majority of opponents. We obviously have tremendous size but slow feet. The counter is great against faster teams leaning on primary reads and having over pursuit tendencies but it also means lineman need to hold and seal or kick-out their opponents on the counter flow....not an evident strength from what I see. Requires good feet and body control movement.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
311
Guests online
1,971
Total visitors
2,282

Forum statistics

Threads
158,049
Messages
4,132,248
Members
10,017
Latest member
mollykate


Top Bottom