Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="visitingcock, post: 4586301, member: 6872"] Bias? No, it's just more noteworthy. 1. At. The beginning of the year, the question re the final four was “ Scar, UConn, Stanford and Who?” Of course people are more interested in the fall of one of the named teams than the potential who” that emerged mid year.” 2. The PAC was touted as the best conference for most of the year (and still is by the NET). The Fall of its powerhouse creates more glee among those (like me) who felt that the conference was way overrated. (I say that in fear of facing UCLA again) 3. Stanford has a number of players and coach who have won the championship and been to the Final Four. Indiana has non - player or coach. We have been posting about them for three years, Indiana has been a hot topic for about a half year, okay, make it 2:3rds of a year, It’s not really bias. We had few questions about Stanford (at least before there PAC tourney loss) But many about Indiana. Years of experience have conditioned us to a tournament loss by a Big Ten loss by any team not Named Maryland. I was shocked by Stanford's loss. I was surprised by Indiana’s. [/QUOTE]