Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
UConn Football
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
Old Hat For Our Geek Squad
.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="UcMiami, post: 2090272, member: 199"] Yeah - I believe that is what he is implying. As comes across in the interview there really is a ton of information and a staggering number of schools to review, and they need to 'organize it in some way' and they are using RPI as the determining organizational principle. I don't have a problem with that in a general way, but it is a very blunt instrument and has gross anomalies built in. Harvard for example has an RPI of 43 and Temple has one of 18 but are they really that strong - in head to head do you think beating Temple is more significant than Oklahoma or Tenn at #19 and #20 or for Harvard, Michigan at 48 and Cal at 56? The problem with something that is based on W/L records of opponents and their opponents is not actually defining the strength or weakness of a team. By the way - the team sheet is basically the same format and information as the NittyGritty site: [URL="http://warrennolan.com/basketballw/2017/nittypro3"]Nitty Gritty Report with Team Pages for 2016-2017 NCAA Women's College Basketball - WarrenNolan.com[/URL] And another question for geeks: I have found that there are some strange results that have persisted in the Sagarin listings this year - I have been sort of disappointed and surprised by the rankings he comes up with as you move away from the top 5 and there have been some strange things in the teens - anyone else having the same issues. There have been some marked divergences with the Massey site. Michigan is the most obvious one - they persisted in the low teens for months on Sagarin before now finally dropping to 23 while Massey has consistently had them in the high twenties and low thirties till they have now dropped to 38. They haven't beaten any decent team all year and it took four losses in their last 5 games to get them out of the teens on Sagarin. (I don't think I have seen anything quite so weird in either Masseys or Sagarin after January before.) [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forum statistics
Threads
164,569
Messages
4,401,545
Members
10,213
Latest member
illini2013
.
..
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
Old Hat For Our Geek Squad
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom