Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="McLovin, post: 4795856, member: 9450"] (Edit: this is data for just this season) Here is a data driven comparison of the 2... [I]Advanced metrics (ShotQuality, Torvik, Evan Miya & KenPom)[/I] [U]ShotQuality Points Per Possession (expected points per shot)[/U] Clingan: 1.22 (88th percentile) [B]Johnson: 1.49 (99th percentile)[/B] [U]Torvik Box Score +/-[/U] [B]Clingan: +7.8[/B] Johnson: +5.6 [U]Evan Miya Bayesian Performance Rating (a metric that looks at offensive and defensive value to the team)[/U] [B]Clingan: 9.23 (2nd nationally among qualifying D1 players)[/B] Johnson: 0.62 (1356th nationally among qualifying D1 players) [U]KenPom Offensive Rating[/U] Clingan: 121.8 (28.1% usage) (398th nationally among qualifying D1 players) [B]Johnson: 126.2 (16.4% usage) (286th nationally among qualifying D1 players)[/B] [I]Other stats (from CBBanalytics.com)[/I] [U]Points / 40 min[/U] [B]Clingan: 24.4 (95th percentile)[/B] Johnson 17.6 (76th percentile) [U]Offensive Rebounding %[/U] [B]Clingan: 21.5% (98th percentile)[/B] Johnson: 10.6% (73rd percentile) [U]Hakeem Percent (% of blocks + steals on defensive possessions)[/U] [B]Clingan: 12.8% (95th percentile)[/B] Johnson: 8.6% (84th percentile) [U]Personal Foul Efficiency (ratio of steals + blocks to fouls)[/U] [B]Clingan: 1.56X (94th percentile)[/B] Johnson: 0.82X (76th percentile) Clingan is clearly better (especially when defense is factored in) but Johnson has been very good this year, too. [/QUOTE]