- Joined
- Aug 17, 2011
- Messages
- 15,478
- Reaction Score
- 87,845
Tied for 12th.
It's two different things. I think non-fans put action bets on UConn because of their recent history, that affects the price.so who’s more believable, the wise guys or the pollsters/selection committee???
hint: rhetorical question
Odds of winning reflect more than just likelihood of winning it all. More public teams will have lower odds than they should because they will garner more betting action. If Duke was in this tourney, they'd probably have top 10/15 odds. In golf tournaments, Spieth/Phil/Tiger will have lower odds than they should because so many casuals/suckers will just blindly bet on them.so who’s more believable, the wise guys or the pollsters/selection committee???
hint: rhetorical question
That's the four 1 seeds, the four 2 seeds, two 3 seeds and one 4 seed above us. RESPECTI’m lazy. Can someone repost this with seeds?
If I ever meet you mr cliffspliffy I may kiss you
Shut up gasbag no one listens to you anyway.Going for broke now. Bust mainly looking for hedge equity.
Just added: MSU 150-1
FSU 40-1
Ok. St. 30-1
SD St. 80-1
Tenn 60-1
WV 50-1
Now I have Illinois, Ok. St., SD St., Tenn, and WV out of the Midwest region, all at 33-1 or higher. That's the 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6 seeds. If just one of them gets to the Final 4, I will have some positive hedge equity. That being said, Houston (2 seed, out of the AAC, whom we have been bashing all year) will probably get there. Total, I have 12 teams, with at least 2 in each region. Should be fun, but I'll probably lose every bet.