Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Get a Job, post: 3940078, member: 9775"] Oh no you didn't! Merriam-Webster defines objective as "expressing or dealing with facts or conditions as perceived without distortion by personal feelings, prejudices, or interpretations." The very concept of boringness is based on someone's feelings and interpretations. Therefore, the idea of something being objectively boring to an audience of more than one person makes little to no sense. The same source defines egregious as "CONSPICUOUS especially [B]: [/B]conspicuously bad [B]: [/B]FLAGRANT." The OP's repeated incorrect usage of the word easily meets that definition in my opinion, especially since he even emphasized one instance using bold type. Now, admittedly, judging something as egregious or not is certainly a [B]subjective[/B] thing. (See what I did there?) [/QUOTE]