Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="nelsonmuntz, post: 4728536, member: 833"]
Read any of about 200+ sites, many of them law firms, discussing Title IX.  Forcing female athletes to miss 50% or more of their classes during season while football, which plays once a week on weekends misses less than half that is a clear title IX violation.  Any attempt to cut other overhead expenses for female athletes would be a clear cut violation.  High schools have lost Title IX cases over the quality of the uniforms and the fields.  The burden of proof in a Title IX case is on the school, which is a big part of the reason so many law firms are shopping for Title IX cases.

Add to that fact that women are 60% of college students in a shrinking market of students, and the bad press of defending a case alone may make it worth it to find a cheap and simple solution that would actually save the schools money.

Or the schools could follow your old male mansplaining logic about how it is fair for young ladies because they are on planes (or something) and the ladies just need to suck it up for the greater good of football, and see where that gets them.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

First name of men's bb coach