Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="CAtlantic, post: 4350133, member: 11388"] college football fan@Genetics56 · 47m Sharing some other data points from what I was provided..the top 15, in the eyes of the Big Ten, for the most financially stable universities across the country are: MI, OSU, TX, Stanford, UCLA, A&M, FL, PSU, WA, MSU, WI, Duke, MN, USC, Cal college football fan@Genetics56 · 45m In the eyes of the Big Ten, the schools they view as financially risky: Missouri, AL, Clemson, Miss, WVU, Kansas State, Baylor, Oregon, Texas Tech, Oklahoma, ARkansas, Miss. State, Oklahoma State, TCU college football fan@Genetics56 · 40m In the eyes of the Big Ten, how they view financial sustainability for each Pac school's athletic department (in order from best to worst): Stanford, UCLA, Washington, USC, Cal, Arizona State, Arizona, Utah, Colorado, OSU, WA ST, Oregon. Big Ten measures this against endownments college football fan@Genetics56 · 29m Fans can get upset about the data if they want to, but that isn't going to change what the data shows. I have the data. Oregon's AD finances when measured against endowments has them last in the eyes of the Big Ten. If you can't handle the data, then you are free to block college football fan@Genetics56 · 19m Yep. FWIW...for Kansas, they are ranked #1 in the Big 12 for financial sustainability in the eyes of the Big Ten. I don't know the rest of the Big 12 rankings though since I don't have that data...only Kansas data for Big 12. Chilly@ChillyinAz_ · 15m Replying to @Genetics56 What is the correlation tho, you can’t use endowments for athletics? college football fan@Genetics56 · 5m They are looking for health....AD revenue vs expense vs funds that come from the schools vs donations and then against endowments. Stanford scores a 100%. [/QUOTE]

Verification: First name of men's bb coach