Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="CAtlantic, post: 4301852, member: 11388"] [MEDIA=twitter]1519145171891404801[/MEDIA] college football fan@Genetics56 · 1h USC reps appose the bill. This is going to get ugly. But once again, it points to the eventual split and YES IT IS GOING TO BE UGLY AND PAINFULL FOR A LOT OF PEOPLE college football fan@Genetics56 · 1h Take note of this as the future is going to be Ohio State Buckeyes Athletics, Inc, Oregon Ducks Athletics Inc., etc. college football fan@Genetics56 · 59m The "folks" read my tweets. I'm told Washington has the support from the state legislature and university leadership to push forward into a pay-to-play environment in the NIL era. college football fan@Genetics56 · 55m To end the night of tweets, I still can't believe Wisconsin athletics are still fighting against the recruiting side of NIL. , Miss schools can now directly communicate with 3rd parties, recruits can enter NIL deals upon verbal commitment, etc. But the Badgers....cont. college football fan@Genetics56 · 54m but the Badgers think they are better than everyone else and are ok with enrolled students making money, but the mere thought of paying someone to attend your school as an athlete is just too much for them. All they are doing is putting into themselves into a RIP status. [/QUOTE]