Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="CAtlantic, post: 4301848, member: 11388"] [MEDIA=twitter]1519074757823582209[/MEDIA] college football fan@Genetics56 · 5h And I am being serious. The new division will not include schools with that type of mindset. college football fan@Genetics56 · 4h Getting left behind is the right answer. If Wisconsin football (more the univeristy) doesn't want to play the money game in the NIL era, there is no chance in hell they will be invited to the new division. Colten Bartholomew@CBartWSJ · 4h I disagree with the last assertion. They've been too successful to get left out in a new alignment. And they're allowing just about everything for enrolled athletes in terms of NIL, so it's not like they're just sitting out of the new world. college football fan@Genetics56 · 4h If you aren't willing to engage in money with recruits, the new division that will happen will not be the right mindset. It will be like-minded universities and that will require money for high school and portal recruits. college football fan@Genetics56 · 4h People always ask if all Big Ten schools will make it to th eventual split for the new division. The answer is NO. And it's going to be a NO for more than people realize. Same with Pac 12. And, no, the Boise State and UAB's of the world will not be in the new divison. college football fan@Genetics56 · 4h With the new division that is coming, you will need to have the mindset in leadership to have a Oregon Ducks Athletics, Inc, Nebraska Cornhuskers Athletics, Inc., etc. That WILL include money going to recruits at the high school and portal, and not just football. college football fan@Genetics56 · 4h allowing players to make money and all of that for an enrolled student is NOT what the new division will be about. Much MORE than that. Independent athletic brands, independent university sports entity for all sports at the university, NIl deals to recruits and portal players. college football fan@Genetics56 · 3h The following universities are the only ones with a 100% lock to the eventual new division: AL, LSU, TN, UGA, FL, UT, OU, Aub., Ark, Ole Miss, A&M, UNL, MI, OSU, PSU, MSU, Miami, USC, Oreg. And, no Notre Dame is NOT a lock. There's a ton of academic elites that will say no. college football fan@Genetics56 · 3h For the elite academic schools, there's going to be a lot of clash happen between what they want the university mission to be and they will sit this out (students/athletics can still get paid obviously). Vandy, UNC, Duke, Stanford, Cal, and the like are highly likely to say no. college football fan@Genetics56 · 3h Many, many years ago there was a time when some of the biggest university names in our country decided not to go down the path that the Alabama's of the world now live in. We are going to once again live through a time when a major split happens between university missions. college football fan@Genetics56 · 3h there's going to be a lot of players on teams in the new division that make more than their position coach. [/QUOTE]

Verification: First name of men's bb coach