Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Football Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
Conference Realignment Board
Non-Key Tweets
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="jostar1, post: 4014505, member: 1737"] Kirk Bohls@kbohls · 5h I'm told Texas A&M and Missouri would be a hard no. Only 2 more needed to block an invitation to Texas, OU. Frank the Tank@frankthetank111 The thought that anyone in the SEC would vote against adding Texas and Oklahoma (outside of maybe Texas A&M in order to superficially placate their alums) is insane to me. This would be the greatest conference realignment heist ever and I say that as a Big Ten guy. Pete Thamel@PeteThamel · 2h Spoke to a few more sources about OU-Texas to the SEC. Few things. They are tied tightly together. A&M's very public objections are the strongest, and getting 11 of the 14 votes doesn't appear to be an issue. Things could move quickly. More soon here..... [URL="https://sports.yahoo.com"]Yahoo! Sports - News, Scores, Standings, Rumors, Fantasy Games[/URL] Frank the Tank @frankthetank111· 52m Right - I can’t imagine getting 11 out of 14 votes will be an issue. Now that everyone knows that Oklahoma and Texas are willing to move alone, the Big Ten would swoop in if the SEC doesn’t close this deal. Greg Sankey is difference here - he’s the alpha dog in college sports Gassman3268@Gassman3268 · 31m Replying to @frankthetank111 What do you think the Big 10 does? They have to make a counter move, right? Frank the Tank@frankthetank111 · 27m Really hard to say. I think the Big Ten likes Kansas, but it’s unclear whether there’s anyone else that makes sense to add with them unless it’s a harder ACC raid. Maybe an odd number of members isn’t relevant if leagues decide that divisions aren’t required for CCGs anymore. Mark Kochenderfer@MarkKochenderfe · 25m Replying to @frankthetank111 I can’t believe Kansas adds enough value to the big 10 to even pay for itself alone. Frank the Tank@frankthetank111 · 22m Remember that KU’s third tier rights deal is 2nd largest in the Big 12 after the Longhorn Network (even more than OU). There are few basketball schools that can move the needle in Power 5 realignment, but Kansas is one of them. BTN is highly dependent on the hoops product. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forums
UConn Athletics
Conference Realignment Board
Non-Key Tweets
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom