Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="CoastAtlantic, post: 2956329, member: 5174"] [USER=1286343007]Greg Flugaur‏ @flugempire[/USER] [URL='https://twitter.com/flugempire/status/1072878465962123265']8h8 hours ago[/URL] Greg Flugaur Retweeted Nicole Auerbach [URL='https://post original url/bprhNOr7HX']https://mobile.twitter.com/NicoleAuerbach/status/1072874177596719104 …[/URL] Playoff Expansion is happening, and it should. [MEDIA=twitter]1072896077274206208[/MEDIA] [USER=1286343007]Greg Flugaur‏ @flugempire[/USER] [URL='https://twitter.com/flugempire/status/1072896702749818881']7h7 hours ago[/URL] Greg Flugaur Retweeted Brett McMurphy [URL='https://post original url/5dYPlcil2H']https://mobile.twitter.com/Brett_McMurphy/status/1072896077274206208 …[/URL] This is incorrect. Expansion to 8 would not have to end CCG’s. Actually..it would increase the value of CCG’s..making them auto bids to 8 team playoffs. [USER=1286343007]Greg Flugaur‏ @flugempire[/USER] [URL='https://twitter.com/flugempire/status/1072898216075673601']7h7 hours ago[/URL] “Neinas’ eight-team model would include five Power 5 conference champions, top Group of 5 champion and two at-large spots. Conference championship games would be eliminated. The regular season would end the weekend after Thanksgiving, with quarterfinal games played on campuses” [USER=1286343007]Greg Flugaur‏ @flugempire[/USER] [URL='https://twitter.com/flugempire/status/1072898217166159877']7h7 hours ago[/URL] How would SEC, B1G, PAC & ACC determine a conference champion without a CCG? Ridiculous notion. CCG’s are not leaving the landscape of College Football. [USER=2354921924]shoobie doobie doowah‏ @Expansion_Crush[/USER] [URL='https://twitter.com/Expansion_Crush/status/1072971018724093953']2h2 hours ago[/URL] They've already been sold well past the end of the current CFB playoff deal [USER=1286343007]Greg Flugaur‏ @flugempire[/USER] [URL='https://twitter.com/flugempire/status/1072971791566602240']2h2 hours ago[/URL] Replying to [USER=2354921924]@Expansion_Crush[/USER] Very true. [USER=1286343007]Greg Flugaur‏ @flugempire[/USER] [URL='https://twitter.com/flugempire/status/1072903911412035585']7h7 hours ago[/URL] If this new 8 team playoff did pass with *best* G5 team receiving a slot in new playoff system I wonder if this would push AAC and ESPN to attempt to expand AAC footprint to BYU & Boise State? Something to ponder. [USER=226092247]Josh Johnson‏ @jsjohnson78[/USER] [URL='https://twitter.com/jsjohnson78/status/1072904670610305025']7h7 hours ago[/URL] Josh Johnson Retweeted Greg Flugaur A change to an 8 team playoff would probably push ND to the ACC and BYU to either the AAC or back to the MWC. But until access to the playoff, not just a meaningless NY6 exhibition game, is actually viable there's no reason for BYU to move. [USER=776834396]Grizzfan‏ @ImaDepper[/USER] [URL='https://twitter.com/ImaDepper/status/1072906338706038784']6h6 hours ago[/URL] Replying to [USER=1286343007]@flugempire[/USER] AAC and Aresco should be doing this already, can't figure out why they haven't moved on this. BYU will never get a P5 invite, and their ESPN deal ends soon. 2 good football schools. Figure out the Olympic sports and get it done. [USER=934037756]former benchwarmer ‘tec‏ @davidmarcus__[/USER] [URL='https://twitter.com/davidmarcus__/status/1072906579316420608']6h6 hours ago[/URL] Replying to [USER=1286343007]@flugempire[/USER] SDSU & Boise? They were the ones who were supposed to join but Boise balked last time when Tulane was added. [USER=127993829]W. Jackson‏ @WesJacksonUSF[/USER] [URL='https://twitter.com/WesJacksonUSF/status/1072914792808112129']6h6 hours ago[/URL] Replying to [USER=776834396]@ImaDepper[/USER] [USER=1286343007]@flugempire[/USER] All dependent of TV deal. Right nowBYU makes much more than current AAC contract. Boise about the same with uneven revenue from MWC. AAC strikes s deal that is worth 8-10 mil all that changes for sure. [USER=167463394]Matt Smith‏ @MattSmithCFB[/USER] [URL='https://twitter.com/MattSmithCFB/status/1072932631837323265']5h5 hours ago[/URL] In an 8-team playoff in 2016, 12-0 Alabama would be locked into a top 4 seed, so it could rest starters for the SEC Championship Game, and then 8-3 Florida could steal an automatic bid against backups. So stupid. [USER=1286343007]Greg Flugaur‏ @flugempire[/USER] [URL='https://twitter.com/flugempire/status/1072933228430934017']5h5 hours ago[/URL] Replying to [USER=167463394]@MattSmithCFB[/USER] The same scenario was alive this year in SEC CCG. But Bama wanted to win SEC and did not fold up. I think you are seeing ghosts where there is none. [USER=1286343007]Greg Flugaur‏ @flugempire[/USER] [URL='https://twitter.com/flugempire/status/1072934289594048518']5h5 hours ago[/URL] Replying to [USER=167463394]@MattSmithCFB[/USER] These schools want to win their Conference titles. There won’t be any folding up. HC’s make too much in bonuses in their contracts for Conference Championships. You can’t eliminate CCG’s and playoffs will expand to 8. [/QUOTE]

Verification: First name of men's bb coach