Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="dwalks93, post: 1600002, member: 5598"] This is the best post of the week and it really illustrates the duplicitous nature of BC. So let me get this straight. BC has been a member of the ACC for nearly 15 years. BC has been an ACC voting member and was part of the "winning" voting block which added Pitt, Syracuse and Louisville. BC has failed to deliver New England to the ACC and voted against UConn's ACC entry to insure they would not have competition in a market they had already lost. Moreover, BC has taken its ACC money and not reinvested it in either facilities or its athletic program, instead treating its P5 money like an ATM. At a time of heightened conference competition, BC has allowed its basketball and football program to sink to arguable the worst in all of the P5 and BC has not won a conference game this year. By every metric BC has been a drain on the ACC and BC's decision making and performance is a large part of why the ACC is falling behind. Yet suddenly the other ACC teams are bound by tradition and should stick together. What about BC? Where is BC's honor and tradition? Shouldn't BC stick with the ACC and own what they helped create? Didn't the BC sign the ACC GORs? Didn't BC make a commitment to the ACC? BC truly proves the old adage "if she'll with cheat you, she'll cheat on you." BC is nothing but consistent. Tusky, I could not imagine a better post which shows the true colors of BC. Thanks for posting [/QUOTE]