Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="junglehusky, post: 1583062, member: 61"] Yes and yes. The main thing holding me back from letting myself believe (for now) is that even if Flugar, BTM and BTM's contact at OU are real people who actually work in the Big Ten and at OU's athletic deparment, it's still only OU's point of view. Flugar has been consistent about saying it's the Big Ten's perception of the Big 12 or OU's perspective. It's great if OU has UConn and Cincy in the top 2, but it isn't enough. If May or June comes and the B12 announces they will make a decision on expansion but not on what to do with the LHN, it would be a sign that Texas and possibly others are still resisting and that might be bad for expansion. Particularly for UConn, because UConn needs a B12N to be a realistic possibility. [/QUOTE]