Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="dwalks93, post: 1570984, member: 5598"] In this scenario, would they be wrong as well to sue you for leaving the AAC, stating your leaving caused the AAC to be diminished in value as a result of your leaving ? And that the principal reason they claimed you left the AAC was not to better yourself, but principally to destroy the AAC ? I would say in such a scenario that they were probably just wrong. They were simply jealous, perhaps bitter, and that would perhaps properly explain their sour grapes, lawsuit, and the like. And yes, they would be wrong on your motives. But if you got to the B12, would you even care what they thought regarding this alleged silly and mistaken nonsense of their claim of your setting out to " destroy the AAC " with your choice to depart the league for another that you simply perceived was a better one, and one that simply offered you more long term stability and the promise of more financial gain ?[/QUOTE] Seriously, let go....its over. BC left and later the BE died...the CT lawsuit was stupid and it failed...BC subsequently blackballed UConn and both programs suffered...we need to move on...sometimes I think it would be easier to solve the Palastine/Israeli issue than BC/UConn We both know BC is in a worse place as a result of expansion. In fact no one from the old BE is in a better place as a result of conference realignment except Rutgers. Finally Rutgers has "won" something...hopefully UConn will join them some day. [/QUOTE]