Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="dwalks93, post: 1570890, member: 5598"]
Comparing the AAC and ACC is ridiculous.  The AAC is a refugee camp of schools who are cobbled together.  There is no rhythm or reason to its membership and it literally spans from Houston to Hartford.  It is a conference in name only.

If the ACC had a vision of what it wanted to be it lost its way.  Did the ACC want to be the east coast conference? A SEC type football conference?  A prestigious academics/athletic conference?  With every expansion the ACC showed a new direct but without a final goal.  If you drive in a circle, it is hard to get anywhere.

The only reasonable conclusion of ACC expansion was it was more focused on killing the BE and less focused on taking the BE territory. It was like a hunter who kills for sport but does not eat the meat....Now the ACC has won the war but cannot pay the reconstruction costs (paying BC, Syracuse, Pitt out of FSU/Clemson's share).

Clearly you are troubled by the claims BC betrayed the BE.  Don't be....what is done is done and BC is paying the price now.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

First name of men's bb coach