Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="jostar1, post: 1537109, member: 1737"] Greg Flugaur ‏@flugempire · 4h4 hours ago Bowlsby"if we could get a situation where we are not forced to play divisions and are not forced to expand, we will be OK" You are not ok Greg Flugaur ‏@flugempire · 4h4 hours ago Again..B12(UT) wants all the advantages of a big conference(12+) and all the advantage of a small conference (10 members) Not happening. Greg Flugaur ‏@flugempire · 31m31 minutes ago Need 8 votes to kill proposal of complete deregulation on determining Conf Champ..ie..CCG with 10 teams with no divisions. Greg Flugaur ‏@flugempire · 28m28 minutes ago 8 votes needed out of 15 to kill proposal: Voting No: B10 = 2 votes SEC= 2 votes PAC= 2 votes MAC=1 vote Need 1 more G5 vote for "No" Greg Flugaur ‏@flugempire · 26m26 minutes ago I don't see MWC voting "yes" for the proposal of total deregulation..but not sure. Last Summer MWC vote "Yes" internally to keep divisions Hank ‏@BigBlueHank · 28m28 minutes ago @flugempire where does ACC stand? Greg Flugaur ‏@flugempire @BigBlueHank They would vote "Yes" for proposal of total deregulation = 2 votes Greg Flugaur ‏@flugempire · 6m6 minutes ago B10 language in their Amendment - CCG "It is appropriate, however, to maintain the provision regarding matching up division winners." Greg Flugaur ‏@flugempire · 8m8 minutes ago With this said....where is there the room for a 11th hour compromise in keeping with what B12 wants...no divisions? [/QUOTE]

Verification: First name of men's bb coach