Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="SubbaBub, post: 1449187, member: 523"]
That would be money made up elsewhere.  Since we are evaluating deals.  The next AAC deal should, if Aresco is any good be around $10M.  I'd shoot for what the ACC is getting but would have to accept something closer to what they were getting before their latest deal.

A $10M deal would not be acceptable for a term longer than a handful of years and it would need to escalate consistent with the equity we'd add.  A buy-in period is perfectly acceptable, akin to the distribution of the old BE credits.  But as with the BE credits, some of that was shared with the new members of the AAC even thought they didn't earn it.  I realize that the payout was a lot higher because the newcomers had leverage in forming the new league, but the same principle applies.   Any new school is a partner, not a hired servant, except maybe to Texas.

And while we are at it, there will be a number G5 for the B12 or any conference they will want the best of the breed, which does limit their choices else they add a Rutgers without the cable boxes that make them so charming.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

First name of men's bb coach