Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="jostar1, post: 1375759, member: 1737"] Greg Flugaur ‏@flugempire 38m After reading McMurphy's statements I see we don't disagree on all things. He does not rule out UH addition.. [URL]http://www.espn929.com/pages/21786932.php?contentType=4&contentId=17618265[/URL] Greg Flugaur ‏@flugempire 39m39 minutes ago ...which I though he did in saying B12 would not expand West. But he does rule out BYU..which as you know my info differs greatly. Greg Flugaur ‏@flugempire 37m37 minutes ago However..McMurphy's pathway to B12 expansion is not realistic for a couple of reasons..which leads him to wrong path Greg Flugaur ‏@flugempire 37m37 minutes ago 1) McMurphy talks about how he sees all conferences with 16 schools..he wraps a nice bow around expansion/realignment. But that is not.. Greg Flugaur ‏@flugempire 35m35 minutes ago ...that is not how it works in the past..not the future. 2) He talks about 5-10 years after B10 might pick off 1/2 ACC schools..however.. Greg Flugaur ‏@flugempire 34m34 minutes ago ...B1G is not picking off any ACC schools in a 5 year timeframe..not with ACC GOR. So his motivation of B12 expansion is off quite a bit. Greg Flugaur ‏@flugempire 32m32 minutes ago So McMurphy and "Big Ten Man" have some agreements..being UH-UCF among top of B12 expansion targets. But much is different among the 2 men Greg Flugaur ‏@flugempire 31m31 minutes ago B12 is not going to expand due to events B1G might do 2025. Dbor words were serious...expansion committee is serious. B12 issues are serious Greg Flugaur ‏@flugempire 29m29 minutes ago So in conclusion: McMurphy's statement seems like words off on old song book of expansion. B12 getting ready to sing an original song [/QUOTE]

Verification: First name of men's bb coach