Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Football Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
Conference Realignment Board
Non-Key Tweets
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="dayooper, post: 1301900, member: 3859"] I think they did want them, but the timing was never right. Nebraska was, and still is the best choice. It just seems like the Big10 wanted to take things slowly and integrate Nebraska better than they did with PSU. They were only taking one at that time. It just happens that the SEC needed a partner with TAMU. Never had the opportunity to get them after Nebraska. That being said, I find it hard to believe that Mizzou would bolt. I'm sure the academics would love it, but the investment they are making into the SEC just to change the course and leave would be ridiculous. Then again, Flugs never said they had interest in the Big10, just the Big10 had interest with Mizzou. All of that being said, if Kansas and Oklahoma are in the picture, then Mizzou would be the perfect school to get. Built in rivalries with Kansas and Nebraska, along with renewing one with Illinois. UConn and Mizzou now would give an additional team to either division if they stayed with two, or these pods if they went to four: Pod A: Illinois, Missouri, Nebraska, and Iowa (with a protected Illinois/Northwestern crossover) Pod B: Minnesota, Wisconsin, Northwestern, Purdue Pod C: Michigan, MSU, OSU, Indiana (protected Indiana/Purdue crossover) Pod D: PSU, Rutgers, UConn, Maryland You would have to add two more teams if/when Oklahoma and Kansas are added, but you could cross that bridge when you come to it. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forums
UConn Athletics
Conference Realignment Board
Non-Key Tweets
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom