Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Football Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
Conference Realignment Board
Non-Key Tweets
.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="TruDomGopher, post: 1291804, member: 4159"] You've probably heard this a hundred times in realignment world: Football drives the bus. What that means is that the big money is in football, specifically the Tier 1 marquee games--the games that the heavy hitters (NBC, CBS, ABC/ESPN, and FOX) pay the big dollars to broadcast. That's why an established program like Oklahoma would almost be a no-brainer addition to the B1G--Oklahoma would make more money and [U]all[/U] of the other B1G schools would make more money, too. A profit, if you will, for adding Oklahoma. UConn, on the other hand, well--UConn football ain't Oklahoma football. And, to make matters worse, throwing current UConn football into the B1G isn't doing UConn any favors and isn't likely to result in any marquee games, especially after the novelty factor wears off after the first year. There's no question of UConn's value to the B1G network--every projection shows it. The question has always been: Does the value added to the network compensate for the lack of Tier 1 football value? The answer is tentatively, yes, although it could be uncomfortably close to a break even proposition. (I won't get into the cable fee/ad revenue split here.) In which case, there's no profit for the 14 existing schools of the B1G to add UConn. If the risk/reward isn't there, why bother? From the B1G point of view, waiting and watching seems sensible. See how the O'Bannon thing appeals out, see how Rutgers/Maryland integrate, see who might be available down the road. There's no rush to add an "iffy" school. However, because of the geographical location, the B1G probably doesn't want to sit idly by and watch UConn go to another conference either. And, of course, I still believe Fox wants to push UConn somewhere--anywhere--they can maximize the basketball brand. Everybody knows UConn is both available and undervalued--the question is "how much?" and "where would UConn fit?" If the ACC makes a move, at least it would force the B1G to ---- or get off the pot. The good news is this: If the ACC suddenly decides the UConn basketball brand would be critical to a successful ACC Network, that frenzied bidding Fishy hasn't seen may be on the horizon. Stay tuned. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forums
UConn Athletics
Conference Realignment Board
Non-Key Tweets
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom