Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Football Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
Conference Realignment Board
Non-Key Tweets
.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="pj, post: 1271150, member: 2524"] The B1G could keep Rutgers waiting because the Big East was a viable, BCS conference with only a modest shortfall in revenue; Rutgers didn't lose by waiting. But the world has changed radically. The AAC is competitively crippled compared to the P5 and if any P5 conference wants UConn (and any that wants to expand should), then UConn can't turn them down in favor of a mere promise by the B1G to be favorably considered in some future expansion. The B1G has to deliver a guarantee of a future invite to keep UConn from accepting a competing invite. The guarantee would have to be in writing. And if UConn's entry is guaranteed, there's no reason not to bring it in immediately. As I've noted, without a partner, special treatment for football would be needed due to scheduling issues (15 schools, 9 game schedule). So the issue is whether some other P5 conference will force the B1G's hand before a #16 is available. If the ACC or B12 extended an invite to UConn, would the B1G watch us go? What if they had a promise from Va Tech to move in ten years when the ACC GoR expires, and they were counting on UConn to be the 16 to pair with Va Tech? Would they really want to double up on lawsuits and exit fees? What about the rumored policy of not raiding more than one school at a time from another P5 conference to avoid being too disruptive -- if UConn went ACC this would preclude an ACC raid; if UConn went B12 would a raid of both B12 and ACC be politically acceptable in the P5 governing structure? I think it comes down to what the B1G's strategy is. If they really want to dominate the northeast population centers, they need UConn to bracket New York and add New England. If they want UConn, and UConn gets an invite from another conference, then they are far better off adding UConn from the AAC with no fuss and enduring speculation about #16 than trying to get UConn away from the ACC or B12 later. Of course, if no other P5 conference wants UConn, then the B1G can afford to wait. The only risk then is a decay of UConn's stature and brand. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forums
UConn Athletics
Conference Realignment Board
Non-Key Tweets
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom