Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Ldandy, post: 1255891, member: 4584"] I realize that these tweets from The Dood and Flug essentially equate to fan fiction, but at the very least they are interesting to discuss. Could the B1G actually be able to leverage ESPN into denying the ACC a conference network? [B]-Unlikely IMO. [/B] Could the difference in revenue between The B1G and ACC be so wide following The B1G's new deal that ACC Stalwarts like UNC or VA could no longer ignore it?- [B]Possibly. How could you ignore making 1-2 hundred million less over a decade?[/B] If Espin controlled the media rights of The B1G, ACC, and SEC, could they essentially direct membership decsions within these conferences in order to obtain maximum revenues for themselves? For example say GT would generate more money as a member of the B1G, could they facilitate that switch?[B] It would seem unlikely, but I imagine it is possible if they are willing to compensate the remaining teams that are left behind.[/B] Would Espin stand aside and allow two other properties destroy a third? [B]Again very hard to imagine, unless Espin's end game is to facilitate 4 super conferences. [/B] Could a substantially larger B1G and SEC with additional marquee properties be more profitable to them than The B1G, SEC, and ACC as they are currently configured? [B]Possibly, but if the left behind schools are relegated to what equates to G5 Status for football, they would likely need to be compensated at P5 Rates in order to avoid major litigation.[/B] [/QUOTE]

Verification: First name of men's bb coach