Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Football Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
Conference Realignment Board
Non-Key Tweets
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="brasssbonanzaa, post: 1229891, member: 794"] I'm very skeptical of Flug's comments. I can see other current non-hockey B1G teams coming in, but an outsider, not really. - The only one that makes sense as new full-fledged all-sport member is UConn. We all know ND is not going, neither is BC. I don't think he's talking about us in that comment. And I don't see us joining as a hockey-only member, and there's absolutely not reason the B1G would offer that to us. If they're looking for a hockey-only associate member there are many, many better options. Not meant as a disrespect to UConn hockey, but the move would make little sense. That'd be like the B1G adding Duke as a football-only member - completely nonsensical. - Similarly, BU would not leave Hockey East unless it was a package deal with BC. Both were invited to the NCHC when it was forming. Both laughed the conference off the phone. - Arizona State theoretically could, but it'd be a weird status as they'd be an associate member. I suppose it's possible, but it'd be 100% irrelevant to other realignment. - Cornell 100% absolutely positively will not go, don't waste anymore time talking about it. Ivies don't leave Ivies. - Buffalo: No. It will not be another startup program unless it has a HUGE financial backing and already has a brand name, such as Arizona State. The B1G hockey conference is having an abysmal year right now, they're at risk of being a one-bid league, and while PSU has been respectable, is not yet a strong program, and Michigan State and Wisconsin are going through very, very rough periods in their history right now. I cannot see them taking on more dead weight in the conference. - The one wild card I can think of is North Dakota joining as an associate member for hockey only. A huge program, enormous fan base, good for TV, major existing rivalries with the Gophers, Badgers, and Michigan, and I know they're not entirely happy with the NCHC. Again, this would be a 100% irrelevant move to realignment more broadly. Seven teams doesn't work, so they'd need to add at least two. Let's suppose his information is correct, my guess would be ASU and NoDak. I do not think in this case he's talking about UConn. If he obtained information that UConn was aligning with the B1G, I can't imagine it would be in the context of hockey, even with him being a Gopher, it just doesn't add up. The more I think about it, ASU/NoDak would be quite logical for them if ASU doesn't want to go NCHC. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forums
UConn Athletics
Conference Realignment Board
Non-Key Tweets
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom