Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Football Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
Conference Realignment Board
Non-Key Tweets
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="pj, post: 1229089, member: 2524"] TruDomGopher's account rings true. Being a traditional football power is really the only thing Nebraska has going for them. The state population is 1.88 million, the same as West Virginia, so little market for the BTN; little academics; no football recruiting ground, so the football program is likely to fade; no basketball. They really got in to the B1G just a year or two before the new model was proven, and before the B1G had committed strategically to markets, money, and academics. If they had a do-over, they'd surely prefer Missouri (6 million people, AAU) to Nebraska. There must have been regret at the Nebraska add, that motivated the commitment to markets, money, and academics that led to the East Coast focus and Rutgers/Maryland adds. To what degree this regret was fostered by growth of cable/BTN revenues leading to a greater focus on markets, by increased emphasis on academics, by increased emphasis on national lobbying power and therefore population, or by de-emphasis on football due to concussion/injury and southern recruiting issues, we can only guess. UConn fits the markets and money criteria and is working on academics. I think UConn to B1G makes too much sense not to happen. But, if the B1G is committed to even numbers of teams and gets opportunities to pick up the best of the ACC or B12, it's possible UConn could be passed over. One thing I wonder is, who would the B1G prefer, UConn or Kansas? The two are almost identical as universities on all academic and sporting metrics, except that UConn is contiguous to much better markets (New York and Boston) while Kansas is contiguous to potential additions (Oklahoma and Texas). I think the B1G would prefer UConn since growing in size brings costs/risks as well as benefits, while markets are clearly beneficial to all B1G schools. FranktheTank thinks Kansas would be favored. I think the B12 is on borrowed time and Texas will be out of reach for the B1G, so if the ACC holds together and the B1G doesn't want 15 or 17, it could come down to best 2 out of 3 from UConn, Kansas, Oklahoma. But I think what the B1G really wants is UConn + UVa or Va Tech, and stop at 16. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forums
UConn Athletics
Conference Realignment Board
Non-Key Tweets
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom