Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Football Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
Conference Realignment Board
Non-Key Tweets
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Dooley, post: 1106014, member: 2920"] The B12 is in serious jeopardy, in my opinion. For example, if the ACC were to lose FSU and/or Clemson, it could survive as a modern day Big East/ACC combination. It would still have a niche as the best basketball conference in the country and still cover enough ground to make money in large TV markets and allow schools to mine for football and basketball recruits within their own footprint. The best replacement options that are stuck in G5 purgatory (UCONN, UCF, Cincinnati), also fall within their footprint making finding replacements much easier. If the B12 lost Texas and/or OU, they are in a world of hurt. I suppose they could try to replace those schools from the same list available to the ACC but that only means that their borders are even larger for travel purposes. I also don't think their round robin style is going to be the preferred method of electing a conference champion for purposes of determining playoff participants, even when the field grows to 8 like we all think. Who's to say who is the best team from the B12 if OU beats WVU who beats Baylor who beats TCU who beats OU who loses to Kansas State who loses to TCU who loses to WVU...and all have identical records? I can see the tremendous panel of "experts" coming together and instead of making a choice from that group, choose to not make that choice and instead make a "safe" pick with a 1-loss, non-champion SEC team in the B12's place. Yes, I suppose a Duke could upset a FSU once every few decades or so in a CG, but on most years, the conference champion is truly decided [I]on the field[/I]. Thus, the decision for the "expert" panel is [B]easier and[/B] [B]safer[/B]. The B12 is certainly bucking the trend by staying at 10, going with a round robin to determine their conference champion, and opting to not explore a Network deal whatsoever. To me, that reeks of insecurity to try to appease the top kings of the conference: OU and Texas. Make them share any more revenue with the plethora of bottom feeders that that conference already has will surely cause them to explore "other options". [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forums
UConn Athletics
Conference Realignment Board
Non-Key Tweets
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom