Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="dayooper, post: 1034396, member: 3859"] I'm sorry, but reruns of ND games to go along with ND basketball and non revenue sports will not get Chicago at a rate higher than a non-footprint rate. If ESPN wants to purchase old ND games, more power to them. It might be for an ACCN, or it might be for ESPN Classic. Since NBC isn't using them, maybe they contacted ESPN and sold them for a ridiculously low price. Am I talking out of my hind parts? Absolutely! No more than this beauty you pulled off: That's how this whole discussion got started, correct? But wait, I thought that The ACC had 60 games, not 30. So what is it? 60 or 30? I really have no clue if there will be an ACCN. I have stated before that I hope there is. An ACCN will do very well Virginia, NC, Florida, SC, and maybe Boston. They will be ok in Georgia and Kentucky. NY and Pennsylvainia? Good luck with those. Unless ND goes all in, Chicago won't be ACC territory at all. Again, these are my OPINIONS. I have no freaking clue what will happen. As far as I know, the UMC/ACC settlement has The Big10 trading NW and Purdue for VPI and NCST. Do I really think that? Maybe OSU is headed to The SEC? Maybe Michigan is going to go all U Chicago and drop down to DIII? The one thing I do know is that I don't know what goes on behind closed doors. Unless someone here is an ACC/Big10/SEC/Big12/Pac12 high up official, a president/AD of a school involved, one of their inner circle, or close with someone in that capacity, the chances of them knowing as more that what I know is slim to none. [/QUOTE]

Verification: First name of men's bb coach