Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Football Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
Conference Realignment Board
Non-Key Tweets
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="itgoeslike, post: 1001876, member: 3691"] [USER=4584]@Ldandy[/USER]: Someone's been drinking the Kool-Aid. 1. More student athletes would benefit if the Playoff proceeds were divided among the 120 or so FBS teams. All the benefits you stipulated could be mandated by the FBS division and funded with the Playoff revenue. All of sudden we've doubled the number of students athletes that would be covered the full cost off attendance, insurance, etc. But, that's not what's happening, and it's by design. 2. The P5 are anything but free market. They simultaneously operate as a non-profit entity or as a for-profit entity, depending upon the advantage derived from each state, while partaking in exclusionary activity that would never be allowed in the business world. If anyone's receiving welfare, it's some of the schools that have been grandfathered in by association. For them, performance and budgets are irrelevant. The remaining FBS schools are the ones earning coin the old fashioned way. Part of me hopes this blows up into a pay-for-play free for all. Then we'll see if some of the so-called P5 will sink or swim. 3. Less parity is not an accident. In fact, the P5 is actively pursuing less parity. If a school like BYU or UCF is competing at higher level than some of the P5, why are those P5 members getting preferential payments? By putting schools within certain conferences in a position to offer benefits beyond others schools, they can consolidate talent. It's not an accident. It's by design. It is what it is, but let's not sugarcoat it. The construct of this whole system appears to be going over your head. Based upon the metrics being employed and the committee makeup, a G5 team will [I]Never[/I] be selected for the playoffs. With P5 conferences shutting out BYU (or any other G5 team), they will never have an RPI or visibility that will enable them to make it into the top 4. [I]Never[/I]. I'm sure at one point there was a movement to improve the welfare of student athletes. But it's been co-opted by old fashioned greed and will be milked for all it's worth. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forums
UConn Athletics
Conference Realignment Board
Non-Key Tweets
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom