Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="navery12, post: 5072924, member: 6271"] Yes the metrics objectively do exactly that. Beating a mid major by 15 that you were expected to beat by 15 is not as impactful as beating a low major by 50 that you were expected to beat by 45. If you want to argue that system is flawed and needs to change, I agree. But it's the system we have and need to schedule for. And it's not a case of the committee saying this 14 point win over penn state really should have been a 43 point win over western grambling tech? It's that the committee doesn't have time for that level of granularity on 100+ teams. So when it's Kansas at 3 in KenPom and UConn at either #2 or #5 in KenPom depending on these OOC results, that's going to affect who the committee gives the #1 overall seed to [/QUOTE]