... and ND isn't going anywhere!
More Big 12 hubbub, but Notre Dame not active in conference talks
By Brian Hamilton
Tribune reporter
8:49 AM CDT, June 28, 2012
Advertisement
The Big 12 has poked around to gauge how much value Notre Dame would bring to it as a member. That much is officially official, thanks to a memo unearthed by an Oklahoma newspaper on Thursday.
Also still officially official: Notre Dame isn't contemplating its conference affiliation regardless.
Irish athletic director Jack Swarbrick on Wednesday put a finer point on the stance he took a week ago, when the Big 12 rumors reignited: Notre Dame isn't engaged in any deliberations regarding a new home for its non-football endeavors.
"We are not in any active decision-making process," Swarbrick told the Tribune in a phone interview.
So that renders somewhat moot
a report from The Oklahoman that confirms the Big 12 took the temperature of television executives regarding how much value Notre Dame would add as a member.
An open records request revealed a memo from interim commissioner Chuck Neinas to the league's expansion committee, in which Neinas said television partners asserted that the "only new member that would enhance the Big 12 value for television was Notre Dame."
As for how much a partial Notre Dame membership would affect the league? Neinas wrote this: "Both representatives of ESPN/ABC and Fox Sports indicated that Notre Dame's involvement with the Big 12 Conference would increase the value of the conference relative to future television and also improve the image of the conference nationwide."
Thus the Big 12's general interest in Notre Dame is in writing. That executives would agree the Irish add value and profile to any league indeed is no shock.
And, anyway, Notre Dame isn't considering the issue at the moment.
Now that the playoff structure has been established, and with Swarbrick saying Wednesday that
some sort of decision on a media deal is imminent, Notre Dame can move on to evaluating their conference affiliation with the Big East. But Swarbrick described that as more matter-of-course examination than landscape-altering decision-making.
"I have tried to be consistent throughout saying, look, there are three things we have to know: what our media future is, what the postseason of college football future is, and what the future of the Big East is," Swarbrick said Wednesday. "Two of those three pieces, I think we're going to have great certainty on.
"We'll have some level of certainty on the third, so it creates an opportunity. We don't have calendared somewhere, 'Let's sit down and do this.' It creates an opportunity at that time to sit back and say, 'OK, what do we see coming?' There's no process in place nor do I anticipate triggering some formal one. But that will be the time to say, we've got this information, we've looked at it, we've been thoughtful about where we are and what we're doing. "