Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="nomar, post: 4950880, member: 651"] I'm all for being creative but I can't get behind this, as it would allow a team that (a) was too crappy to get into the NCAA tourney one year and (b) is too crappy to get into the NCAA tourney the next year to get in over a team that (a) was good enough to make the NCAA tourney one year and (b) has a better resume than the NIT champ. I also don't think it's enough incentive to get teams to participate in the NIT, balanced against all the reasons teams and players now have to skip it. [/QUOTE]