Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="CL82, post: 4777426, member: 44"] I agree. The horse is out of the barn on this. That's why my post started with "theoretically". But, at the NCAA capped it initially, it would've worked. It's easy to set a rule that gives money to people. It's hard to set at a rule that takes money away from people. I really think it could've been capped it at 15 or $20,000 in all honesty. It sounds ridiculously low now, but then kids would've been happy with the prospect of getting an extra 20 K. In any event, I think if you take the four rules that I laid out and add to it [USER=1414]@HuskyHawk[/USER]'s prohibition against boosters creating an IL for a student athlete of their team, I think you have the framework of something that would work. [/QUOTE]