Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="diggerfoot, post: 4372039, member: 1673"] Your question seems to assume the PG should be the most valuable player, which I guess is because of what started the thread. But the started PG does not have to be the most valuable player, does not have to be the best player, does not even have to be one of the players you want on the floor in the last minute. She needs to be the one who can best facilitate the offense for most of the game. I took another look at Fudd’s assist totals, not to compare them with either Muhl or Bueckers, which would be unfair, but all the other guards besides them. Fudd’s assists per minute were the lowest …. by far! It’s not hard to understand why, she is the primary target to be set up, not to set others up. Fudd has shown the least inclination of being the facilitator needed for PG out of all the choices, whether by nature or design, yet people automatically think her being the best all around player naturally makes her the best PG. Fudd is talented enough so she could possibly be trained as a great PG, but there are only a few months to do it and it would only be a temporary solution. Without that investment, Fudd really is not a logical choice for the PG position. At this point I would be more interested in hearing reasons why Senechal or even Ducharme might usurp Muhl’s minutes as a PG. [/QUOTE]